Company Snapshot: LO  Print This Story  Email This Story  Save this Link View PR Newswire's RSS Feed  Blogs Discussing this News Release  Search Blogs that Mention this News Release  Click this link to view linked Bookmarking Services Click this link to view linked Blogging Services


Lorillard Tobacco Company Issues Letter to the New York Times After Paper Refuses to Share it With Readers

    GREENSBORO, N.C., Aug. 26 /PRNewswire/ -- Lorillard Tobacco Company, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Lorillard, Inc. (NYSE: LO), today issued the
following letter that the Company had sent to The New York Times in
response to a recent editorial.

    The Times rejected the letter without a sufficient explanation,
reinforcing its unwillingness to present opposing viewpoints to its
readers. By doing so, The Times has failed to provide a balanced and fair
view of an important issue where an honest review would advance the debate.

    A copy of the original editorial is available at
http://www.nytimes.com/. The letter, written by Martin L. Orlowsky,
Chairman, President & CEO of Lorillard, Inc., was submitted to The Times
two working days following the editorial's publication, and reads as
follows:


August 19, 2008 Editor New York Times 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Dear Editor: Your editorial, "Smooth and Dangerous," (August 14, 2008), more appropriately characterizes the concerted effort being undertaken to target the companies that manufacture and market menthol cigarettes. It is simply the latest example of a sophisticated campaign by paternalistic moralists to take away a smoker's choice to smoke menthol cigarettes, or to smoke at all, without regard for the facts or for sound science. It is all the more dangerous because it portends the demise of individual choice. It comes as no surprise that your paper advocates the regulation of the tobacco industry by the Food and Drug Administration. However, repeating unsupported allegations about menthol to justify such FDA oversight is simply irresponsible and undermines the integrity of the editorial process. You claim in the editorial that "There is ample reason to suspect that menthol may be harmful to many smokers and disproportionately harmful to black Americans," but offer no scientific support. You claim that menthol "would seem to make it easier for the tobacco industry to lure new smokers and keep chronic smokers from quitting" but provide no proof. You state that "Some experts worry that menthol cigarettes may be one reason why blacks suffer disproportionately from tobacco related diseases," only to immediately contradict yourself by noting that recent studies do not support that claim. The fact is that the science does not support these claims. Bottom line, and in your own words, "The [scientific] evidence [for the harmful effects of menthol] so far is not conclusive." You admit that recent scientific studies "have found no significant difference in the risk of disease for smokers who use mentholated cigarettes and those who don't," yet you nonetheless advocate for a ban on menthol. Your attack on menthol is nothing more than an opportunity to gain your ultimate end, the prohibition of all tobacco products and the establishment of a tobacco free society. That is the reason you are using the menthol issue to inflame passions along racial divides, and are making accusatory statements without foundation. Whether to impose Prohibition on cigarettes is a debate that we welcome, but it is a debate that needs to be waged on facts and science. It is a debate that should be settled without inflammatory and accusatory rhetoric. Editorials like yours only fan the flames of racism and do not move the cause forward. The American people deserve to understand that if the anti-tobacco establishment convinces Congress to first ban menthol and eventually outlaw all tobacco, other powerful groups will follow to impose their idea of what is good for us to eat, drink and think. Congress should realize that those who support a ban on menthol and the unworkable regulation of tobacco that is currently being considered are really just looking to further their real agenda, and it won't stop with tobacco.
Thank you. Martin L. Orlowsky Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Lorillard, Inc. About Lorillard, Inc. Lorillard, Inc. (NYSE: LO), the parent company of Lorillard Tobacco Company, is the third largest manufacturer of cigarettes in the United States. Lorillard was founded in 1760, and is the oldest continuously operating tobacco company in the U.S. Newport(R), Lorillard's flagship brand, is a menthol-flavored premium cigarette brand and the top selling menthol and second largest selling cigarette in the U.S. In addition to Newport, the Lorillard product line has five additional brand families marketed under the Kent(R), True(R), Maverick(R), Old Gold(R) and Max(R) brand names. These six brands include 44 different product offerings which vary in price, taste, flavor, length and packaging. Lorillard's manufactures all of its products at its Greensboro, North Carolina facility and maintains its headquarters there. Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements made in this press release are "forward-looking" statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, or the Reform Act. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may project, indicate or imply future results, events, performance or achievements, and may contain the words "expect", "intend", "plan", "anticipate", "estimate", "believe", "will be", "will continue", "will likely result", and similar expressions. In addition, any statement that may be provided by management concerning future financial performance (including future revenues, earnings or growth rates), ongoing business strategies or prospects, and possible actions by Lorillard, Inc. are also forward-looking statements as defined by the Reform Act. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and projections about future events and are inherently subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of Lorillard, Inc., that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or projected. Information describing factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements is available in Lorillard, Inc.'s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These filings are available from the SEC over the Internet or in hard copy, and are, in some cases, available from Lorillard, Inc. as well. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the time they are made, and Lorillard, Inc. expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to update these statements to reflect any change in expectations or beliefs or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based.
SOURCE Lorillard Tobacco Company




Back to Topback to top

CONTACT:
Michael W. Robinson, +1-202-973-1340,
mrobinson@levick.com, for Lorillard Tobacco Company