Print This Story  Email This Story  Save this Link View PR Newswire's RSS Feed  Blogs Discussing this News Release  Search Blogs that Mention this News Release  Click this link to view linked Bookmarking Services Click this link to view linked Blogging Services


Statement of the Council of Institutional Investors in Response to the Report of the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation

    WASHINGTON, Nov. 30 /PRNewswire/ -- The Council of Institutional
Investors disagrees strongly with the Committee on Capital Markets
Regulation's assertion that overzealous regulation is stifling U.S.
competitiveness. We also believe that many of the panel's recommendations,
if adopted, would undermine the effectiveness of market watchdogs and
weaken critical investor protections.
    However, we commend the committee for acknowledging the importance of
shareowner rights and recognizing that the U.S. capital markets need to
strengthen these rights. While we support the committee's recommendations
in this area, we think that further steps should be taken to safeguard
shareowner rights. Accordingly, we encourage the committee to:
    * Urge all corporate boards, not just those with classified voting
      structures, to obtain shareowner approval before adopting "poison pill"
      anti-takeover measures;
    * Encourage all states to change their corporation laws to require
      majority voting for directors; and
    * Call on the Securities and Exchange Commission to ensure that
      shareowners have some ability to nominate their own board candidates to
      be included on management proxy ballots.
    The integrity and efficiency of the U.S. capital markets are vitally
important to the Council of Institutional Investors. Our members have a
significant, long-term commitment to the domestic marketplace. Council
members and other investors shoulder the costs of legal and regulatory
inefficiencies. But they also suffer when rules fail to protect investors.
"We support efforts to address market inefficiencies, so long as they do
not put investors at risk," says Ann Yerger, the Council's executive
director.
    The Council agrees that the SEC and the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board should ensure that Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is
implemented in a way that is risk-based and cost-effective. We applaud
their current efforts to achieve these goals. We are optimistic that the
SEC and the PCAOB will fix the implementation problems with Section 404,
and confident that there will be no need to exempt the smallest U.S.
publicly traded companies.
    While the committee raises legitimate questions about the level of
regulation and litigation, we think it views these issues through far too
narrow a prism, by focusing primarily on the market for initial public
offerings. IPOs, while a key source of revenue for Wall Street investment
bankers, are not the sole, nor the best, basis on which to judge the health
of the U.S. economy or the appropriateness of U.S. rules and laws. And the
committee's contention that fear of lawsuits and excessive regulation,
particularly costs associated with Section 404, have driven the decline in
IPO listings is off-base. The U.S. share of the IPO market peaked a decade
ago, long before Sarbanes-Oxley and other post-Enron reforms. Several
factors have contributed to the erosion of U.S. dominance of the global IPO
market, including:
    * Privatization of state-owned enterprises in emerging markets (Not
      surprisingly, governments selling off such businesses often prefer a
      listing on their home exchanges);
    * High U.S. investment banking fees relative to underwriting fees on
      European exchanges; and
    * Growing globalization, which has increased the sophistication of
      emerging markets.
    U.S. markets enjoy the lowest cost of capital. The amount of money
raised by foreign companies in U.S. IPOs has grown since Sarbanes-Oxley was
enacted in the wake of a shocking series of corporate scandals. In the
first eight months of 2006, it hit $5.8 billion, the highest level since
2000. Rigorous U.S. investor protections are a boon, not a bust, for our
capital markets.
    The Council of Institutional Investors is a not-for-profit association
of 140 public, union and corporate pension funds with assets exceeding $3
trillion. The Council works to educate members and the public about
corporate governance, and to advocate for strong governance standards on
issues ranging from executive compensation to the election of corporate
directors.


SOURCE Council of Institutional Investors




Back to Topback to top

Related links:
  • http://www.cii.org
    CONTACT:
    Amy Borrus, Deputy Director of Council of
    Institutional Investors, +1-202-261-7082, amy@cii.org