WASHINGTON, May 6 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- After weeks of pretending
to be "a different kind of Republican," John McCain showed his true colors
today in his speech about the kind of judges he would appoint as president.
While he makes a show of trying to recast himself as a "moderate" for the
general election, in reality John McCain is promising four more years of
right wing judges bent on pushing a radical agenda from the bench. In fact,
in his 22 years as a Republican Senator, John McCain has never voted
against a single judicial nomination by a Republican President. No matter
how far outside the mainstream they have been, John McCain has been a loyal
rubberstamp for their radical right wing agenda.
The following is a statement from Democratic National Committee
Chairman Howard Dean responding to John McCain's right wing judicial
philosophy:
"As John McCain said today, our next president will make hundreds of
judicial nominees with far-reaching consequences for the future of our
country. Given John McCain's radical, right wing judicial philosophy, it's
clear he's the wrong choice to safeguard that future. No matter how far
they have gone to restrict our fundamental rights or their clear records of
gutting the reforms John McCain claims to care about, he has put loyalty to
his party and a radical agenda ahead of the American people. When voters
see John McCain's real record, they are not going to elect a radical
rubberstamp who voted for every one of President Bush's activist judges and
promises hundreds more just like them."
JUDGING MCCAIN'S JUDGES
2000: McCain Secretly Promised Pro-Life Judicial Litmus Test, While
Bush Would Not Make Similar Guarantee. "Somewhat surprisingly, McCain had
the support of Gary Bauer, the social conservative, who had dropped out of
the race by that time," reported the New Yorker. Bauer explained: "I wanted
a commitment from either George Bush or John McCain that if elected he
would appoint pro-life judges to the Supreme Court...Bush said he had no
litmus test, and his judges would be strict constructionists. But McCain,
in private, assured me he would appoint pro-life judges." [New Yorker,
5/30/05]
McCain Ran to the Right of Bush On Judicial Litmus Test. "In 2000, when
McCain last ran for president - which is what he is doing now - he earned
the support of Gary Bauer, a conservative Christian, because he promised
Bauer he would 'appoint pro-life judges.' This, Bauer told The New Yorker,
was further than George Bush was willing to go at the time. [Washington
Post, 5/16/06]
Environmentalists Wary of McCain's Appointments To The Supreme Court.
Joseph Romm, former top Energy Department efficiency and renewable energy
official said that environmentalists worry that McCain's appointments to
the Supreme Court would be extremely conservative. They worry that
conservative judges "would overturn last year's landmark 5-4 ruling -- in
Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency -- that the EPA has the
authority to regulate carbon dioxide under existing laws. 'We will have a
devil of a time getting serious action on global warming if the Supreme
Court reverses its position,' says Romm." [Business Week Online, 4/22/08]
McCain Praised Alito And Roberts As Two Of The Greatest Justices In
Court's History. The East Valley Tribune reported that "Furthermore, he
commended President Bush's nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to
the high court, calling them 'two of the greatest' justices in its history.
Both sided with the majority in the abortion case. McCain said he would
appoint similar candidates -- those who would strictly interpret the U.S.
Constitution and who wouldn't legislate from the bench." [East Valley
Tribune, 4/29/2007]
-- Roberts Wrote That Roe V Wade Was "Wrongly Decided And Should Be
Overturned." In 1990 while serving as the Deputy Solicitor
General, Roberts coauthored a brief in the case of Rust v. Sullivan,
"[w]e continue to believe that Roe was wrongly decided and should
be overruled . . . [T]he Court's conclusion [] in Roe that there is
a fundamental right to an abortion . . . find[s] no support in the text,
structure, or history of the Constitution." [Brief for the
Respondent, Rust v. Sullivan, 1989 U.S. Briefs 1391 (1990)]
-- Roberts Would Have Taken Position That Would Have Deprived American
Soldiers Tortured in Iraq from Seeking Restitution. The case of Acree
v. Republic of Iraq was filed under the terrorism exception to the
Foreign Soverign Immunities Act by seventeen American soldiers who had
been captured and tortured during the Gulf War. The district court had
decided in favor of the plaintiffs, but the government contended that
the court did not have jurisdiction due to federal law. Two of the
judges on the panel, Harry Edwards and David Tatel, rejected the
government's argument, but Roberts, however, would have adopted the
position of the government that federal law "deprived the courts of
jurisdiction over suits against Iraq" for damages resulting from
torture and other terrorist acts. The result would have been to deprive
Americans tortured in Iraq of any possible relief in federal court.
[Acree v. Republic of Iraq, 370 F.3d 41 (D.C. Cir. 2004)]
-- Alito Would Require Women To Notify Husbands Before Exercising Her
Reproductive Rights. Alito wrote a troubling opinion concerning
reproductive rights in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania
v. Casey. The Third Circuit in Casey upheld a number of the provisions
in the restrictive abortion law enacted by Pennsylvania in the late
1980's, in an opinion that questioned Roe v. Wade. But the Third
Circuit struck down the law's requirement that women notify their
spouses before having an abortion. Alito dissented because he would
have gone even further than the rest of the court and would have upheld
the spousal notification requirement. [Planned Parenthood of
Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 947 F.3d 682 (3d Cir. 1991),
aff'd in part, rev'd in part 505 U.S. 833 (1992); Washington
Times, 10/29/1991]
McCain Was Key Negotiator In Deal That Lead To Confirmations Of
Ultra-Conservative Judges Owen, Brown and Pryor. "The deal, which was
finalized in McCain's office after a weekend of back-and-forth discussions
between Byrd and Sen. John Warner (R-Va.), would put an end to three
filibusters and allow votes on three appellate court nominees: Owen, Janice
Rogers Brown and William Pryor." [Chicago Tribune, 5/24/2005]
-- Pryor Called Abortions "An Abomination" And Said Overturning
Sodomy Laws Would Lead To "Necrophilia" And
"Pedophilia." "But he scandalized many Democrats and
proponents of a centrist Supreme Court by calling the 1973 Roe decision
legalizing abortions nationwide an abomination. He has also said that
when the Supreme Court overturned state sodomy laws used against gays,
it gave the green light to 'necrophilia' and even
'pedophilia' so long as the child was deemed
'willing.'" [Chicago Tribune, 5/1/2005]
-- Even Alberto Gonzalez Blasted Owen's "Unconscionable Act Of
Judicial Activism." "Owen's opponents have made much over
her opinion in a 2000 case involving a Texas law that requires girls to
notify their parents before they have an abortion, unless a court finds
she's 'sufficiently well-informed' and
'mature.' .Of Owen's dissent, U.S. Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales, who was then on the court, wrote that 'to create
hurdles that simply are not to be found in the words of the statute
would be an unconscionable act of judicial activism.'" [St.
Petersburg Times, 5/22/05]
-- Brown Bashed Federal Regulatory Efforts, Called New Deal Economic
Regulations A "Socialist Revolution." "In speeches to
conservative groups, she has described a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court ruling
upholding New Deal economic regulation as 'the triumph of our own
socialist revolution;' has declared that when government moves in,
'the result is families under siege, war in the streets ... and the
triumph of deceit;' and has said senior citizens 'blithely
cannibalize their grandchildren' for government benefits. Opponents
say Brown's condemnation of government is especially troubling
because the court to which she has been nominated by Bush, the U.S.
Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., hears more cases involving federal
regulations than any other." [San Francisco Chronicle, 5/18/05]
McCain Even Backed Bork, Who Criticized "One Man, One Vote" As Counter
to the Fourteenth Amendment. In 1971, he said that "the principle of 'one
man, one vote' runs counter to the text of the Fourteenth Amendment, the
history surrounding its adoption and ratification, and the political
practice of Americans from colonial times up to the day the court invented
the new formula."" [Washington Post, 7/2/1987]
-- McCain Voted To Confirm Bork As An Associate Justice Of The Supreme
Court. McCain supported the confirmation of the nomination of Robert H.
Bork to be an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. [1987 Senate
Vote 348, 10/23/1987]
Paid for and authorized by the Democratic National Committee,
http://www.democrats.org.
This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's
committee.
|
